EFFICACY OF GRAPHIC ORGANIZER ON PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN COGNITIVE WRITING SKILLS
Abstract
This study investigated the efficacy of graphic organizer on junior secondary school students’ cognitive writing development skills. The study also determined the influence of school type and gender on the performance of students taught with graphic organizer (GO). The study was necessitated because of the problem of non-readable hand-writings of the pupils in junior secondary schools. The quasi-experimental design which involved the pre-test, post-test, control group design was employed for the study. The research sample was drawn from two randomly selected junior secondary schools from Ile-Ife, Oyo State, Nigeria. Students from the sampled class were further stratified along gender. The instruments used for collecting data were Graphic Organizer Achievement Test (GOAT) and the graphic organizer (GO). Graphic Organizer Achievement Test (GOAT) was pilot tested for reliability using the test-retest method of three weeks interval and Pearson Moment Product Correlation coefficient analysis revealed a reliability coefficient value of .78. The two hypotheses were tested using t-test. Findings indicated that, students taught with the graphic organizer performed better than those taught with conventional method. It was shown that the gender of pupils was not a factor in the performance of students when they were taught with Graphic Organizer. Based on the findings, it was recommended that teachers should used. Graphic Organizer in teaching Cultural and Creative Arts to enhance students’ performance.
Keywords: Graphic Organizers, Cognitive Writing Development, Public and Private Primary Schools, Gender, Cultural and Creative Arts
References
Alabi, T. O., Emmanuel, O., & Falode, C. O. (2015). Effects of videodisc mediated and computer assisted instructional packages on achievement of junior secondary school mathematics students in geometry in Minna, Nigeria. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Education (JOSTMED), 11(3)240 -251.
Alshatti, S. A. (2012). Embedding graphic organisers in the teaching and learning of family and consumer science (Home Economics). Unpublished PhD thesis, Centre for Learning Innovation Faculty of Education Queensland University of Technology.
Ayuerdi, L., Nakiboslu, C., & Ozayin, S. (2014). Usage of graphic organizers in science and technology lessons. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4264 – 4269.
Babalola, I. (2007). Effectiveness of video as an instructional medium in teaching rural children agricultural and environmental sciences. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. (IJEDICT),3 (3),105-114.
Chohan, S. (2011). Any letter for me? Relationships between an elementary school letter writing program and student attitudes, literacy achievement, and friendship culture. Early Childhood Education, 39(1), 39-50.
Clark, A. (2007). GOs and the school library program. University of Alberta Department of Elementary Education.
Cleveland, M. (2005). Content area graphic organizers social studies. Portland, Maine: Walch Publishing.
Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(1), 51-72.
Egan, M. (1999). Reflections on effective use of graphic organizer’s. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42 (8), 641-645.
Ellis, E. (2004). What’s the big deal about GO? Retrieved on January 23rd, 2010, from http://graphicorganizer.com
Githua, B., & Nyabwa, R. A. (2008). Effects of graphic organiser strategy during instruction on secondary school student's mathematics achievement in Kenya's Nakuru District. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (6), 439-457.
Hall, T., & Strangman, N. (2008). National center on accessing the general curriculum at cast. Walch Education.
Jasmine, J., & Weiner, W. (2007a). Using graphic organizers to teach writing 1 an examination of using graphic organizers to teach writing: A case study Katie Lancaster Eastern Illinois University. ELE 5900 Spring 2013
Jasmine, J., & Weiner, W. (2007b). The effects of writing workshop in abilities of first grade students to become confident and independent writers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(2), 131-139.
Josiah, O., & Adaramati, T. F. (2015). Effects of graphic organiser on students’ achievement in algebraic word problems. Journal of Education, 6, (5), 122 – 222.
Jones, J. B. (2009, November). Challenging the presentation paradigm (in 6 minutes, 40 seconds): Pecha Kucha. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com on the 6th August 2014.
Kalilu, R. O. (2013). Art from art for art conceptualising existence in the space of the visual arts. Inaugural Lecture Series 10, delivered at Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso. Lagos, SOF & Co. Press.
Katayama, A. D., & Crooks, S. M. (2003). Online notes: Differential effects of studying complete or partial graphically organised notes. Journal of Experimental Education, 71 (4), 293 - 312.
Karsbaek, B. (2011). Writer’s workshop: Does it improve the skills of young writers? Illinois Reading Council Journal, 39(2), 3-11.
Kim, A. H., Vaughan, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizer and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A Synthesis of Research. Hammill Institute on Disabilities (37, 105).
Kools, M., van de Wiel. W. J., Ruiter, A. C., Cruts, A., & Kok, G. (2006). The effect of graphic organizers on subjective and objective comprehension of a health education text. Health Education Behaviour Onlinefirst.
Kristina, C. (2010). The usefulness of graphic organizers in enhancing science. UK: Learning Fisher Digital Publications.
Levasseur, D. G., & Sawyer, J. K. (2006). Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: A research review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom. The Review of Communication, (6), 101-123.
Lovitt, S. (1994). Strategies for adapting science textbooks for youth with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 105-116.
McElroy, L. T., & Coughlin, C. N. (2009). The other side of the story: Using graphic organizer as cognitive learning tools to teach students to construct effective counter-analysis. Unpublished Thesis University of Baltimore Law Review.
Meera, P., & Aiswarya, K. (2014). A study on the effectiveness of graphic organizers in the writing skill of English among secondary school students. https://www.scholarworld.net, 2, (IV), 72-82.
Mercer, C., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching Algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 121- 131.
Michelle, J., & Marie, P. (2013). Effects of visual media on achievement and attitude in a secondary biology classroom. Unpublished Master Thesis submitted to Faculty of the Education and Human Services, Ohio University.
Miller, S. (2011). Using graphic organizers to increase writing performance. Unpublished MA thesis. State University of New York at Fredonia.
Nsofor, C. C., & Momoh, G. D. (2013). Effects of developed electronic instructional medium on students’ achievement in biology. Journal of Education and Learning, 2 (2).
Robinson, D. H., & Molina, E. (2002). The relative involvement of visual and auditory working memory when studying adjunct displays. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (27), 118-131.
Sewidan, K., & Al-Jazar, B. (2007). Education technology for people with special needs. Amman: Dar Al-Fikr Publishers & Distributors.
Sundeen, T. (2007). So what’s the big idea? Using graphic organizers to guide writing for secondary students with learning and behavioural issues. Beyond Behaviour, 16(3), 29-33.
Usman, A., Odewumi, O., Obotuke, E., Apolola, O., & Ogunyinka, C. O. (2014). Cultural and creative arts book one for junior secondary schools. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.
Zaini, S. H., Mokhtar, S. Z., & Nawawi, M. (2010). The effect of graphic organizer on students’ learning in school. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 17-23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.