EĞİTİM ALANINDA STEM VE SOSYAL BİLİMLERLE İLGİLİ ARAŞTIRMALAR: İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Abstract

RESEARCH ABOUT SOCIAL SCIENCES AND STEM IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION: A CONTENT ANALYSIS

In the era in which we live, students are being putin the center of learning environment. In present approaches supporting this idea have accumulated to put its power on education. The STEM training model aims to train economically, creative leaders who have achieved the age of information and information. In addition, it puts equal opportunities in education into all these objectives. The aim of this course is to remove the science and mathematics lessons from the memorization system, to apply the knowledge in real life and to develop problem solving techniques / methods, to raise the curiosity, research and creativity characteristics. Social sciences are also very important for the human being, a social being. Social sciences play an important role in providing the balance between the needs of the individuals living in the community and the expectations of the society and in terms of providing them with the necessary knowledge, skills, attitudes and values. Social Studies is very important in terms of introducing the events related to the earth, explaining the reasons for their existence, citizenship rights and duties, what their responsibilities are, and in short, revealing the past, present and future interaction with the human and its social and physical environment. In this study, a content analysis study was conducted by examining the studies on ”stem” and “social sciences” in the learning-teaching process in recent years.

Key Words: Education, Stem, Social Sciences, Content Analysis

Öz

İçinde bulunduğumuz bilgi çağında; öğrenciler öğrenme ortamının merkezine yerleştirilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Günümüzde bu anlayışa sahip eğitim yaklaşımları, eğitim sisteminde ağırlıklarını hissettirmeye başlamıştır. STEM eğitim modeli, ekonomik olarak ilerlemeyi, bilgi ve bilişim çağını yakalamış yaratıcı liderler yetiştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bunların yanı sıra tüm bu hedeflerin içine eğitimde fırsat eşitliğini de koymaktadır. Burada hedef, öğrencilere Fen bilimleri, Matematik gibi dersleri ezber sisteminden çıkartıp, bilgilerin gerçek yaşamda uygulanabilirliği ve problem çözme tekniklerini/metotlarının geliştirilmesi, merak, araştırma ve yaratıcılık özelliklerinin öne çıkartılmasını hedef alınmaktadır. Toplumsal bir varlık olan insan için sosyal bilimler de oldukça önemlidir. Toplum içinde yaşayan bireylerin ihtiyaçlarıyla toplumun beklentileri arasındaki dengeyi sağlamada, bireylere gerekli bilgi, beceri, tutum ve değer kazandırma açısından sosyal bilimlere önemli görevler düşmektedir. Sosyal Bilgiler yeryüzüne bağlı olayları tanıtan, bunların oluş sebeplerini açıklayan, vatandaşlık hak ve ödevlerinin, sorumluluklarının neler olduğunu belirten, kısaca insan ve onun sosyal ve fiziki çevresiyle geçmişte, günümüzde ve gelecekteki etkileşimini ortaya koyması bakımından son derece önemlidir. Bu düşünceden hareketle bu çalışmada, son yıllarda öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde “stem” ve “sosyal bilimler” konularının ele alındığı çalışmalar incelenerek bir içerik analizi çalışması yapılmıştır.

Anahtar Sözcükler: Eğitim, Stem, Sosyal Bilimler, İçerik Analizi

KAYNAKÇA

Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T., ve Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu. İstanbul: Scala Basım.

Aksu, M., Berberoğlu, G., ve Paykoç, F. (1991). Mantıksal düşünmenin belli değişkinlere göre incelenmesi. Eğitimde Arayışlar I. Sempozyumu Bildiri Metinleri, 291-294.

Ali, A. T. (2012). Teaching & learning of science & mathematics in schools: towards a more"creative & innovative Malaysia". Paper presented at the Colloquium Science & Mathematic Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Bagiati, A., Yoon, S.Y., Evangelou, D. ve Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 2-13.

Bartholomew, R., Anderson, D. ve Moeed, A. (2012). Resilience of Science Teaching Philosophies and Practice in Early Career Primary Teaching Graduates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(2), 103-112.

Brown, J., Brown R., ve Merrill, C. (2012). Science and technology educators’ enacted curriculum: areas of possible collaboration for an integrative STEM approach in public schools. Technology Teacher, 71(4), 30- 34.

Bybee, R. W ve Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349-352.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA press.

Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471-486.

DeJarnette, N. K. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering and Maths) initiatives. Journal of Education, 133(1), 77-84.

Demircioğlu, İ. H., ve Tokdemir, M. A. (2008). Değerlerin oluşturulma sürecinde tarih eğitimi: Amaç, işlev ve içerik. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(15), 69-88.

Ellis, P. D. (2011). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis and the interpretation of research results. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Erden, M. ve Akman, Y. (1996). Eğitim Psikolojisi: Gelişim-Öğretimi-Öğretme, (3. Baskı). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi.

Goldberg M. A. (2002). Human Capacity Building for APEC Science, Technology & Innovation: Preconditions & Key Issues to Succeed. (Proceeding APEC-ISTWG Forum Paper Summary . APRU-APEC Committee, Berkeley California.

Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., ve Moore, T. (2014). Development of an instrument to assess attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271-279.

Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., ve de Miranda, M.A. (in- press). Connecting the STEM dots: Measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education http://doi: 10.1007/s10798-013-9241-0

Humphrey, S. E. (2011). What does a great meta-analysis look like? Organizational Psychology Review, 1(2), 99-103.

Jones, A., Buntting, C. &Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology Design Education 23, 191- 212.

Kabilan, M. K. (2003). Online professional development of teachers: An examination of structures and trends in Malaysia. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 367-382.

Kieong, C. K. (2012). Vision 100K. Paper presented at the TheInstituitionof Engineers, 53rd Presidental Address, Malaysia.

Lai, E. R., ve Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings. Pearson.

Lindahl, B. (2003). Pupils' responses to school science and technology? : A longitudinal study of pathways to upper secondary school.Unpublished summary of PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg, Kristianstad.

Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Foy, P., ve Stanco, G.M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Mena, I. B., Diefes-Dux, H.A. (2012). First-year engineering students' portrayal of engineering in a proposed museum exhibit for middle school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21(2), 304-316.

Meyrick, M. K. (2011). How STEM Education Impress Student Learning. Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal, 14(1), 1-6.

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). (2008).2008 Report: Malaysian science and technology indicatiors. Putrajaya: Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre, MOSTI.

Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., Suh, J. (2013). Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(2), 115-129.

Nordin, K. (2012). JumlahPelajarSains Di IPT Makin Kurang, BeritaHarian [The Total Science Students at Local Varsities Are Decreasing]. Retrieved from Berita Harian. Retrieved from http://www.bharian.com.my/articles/Jumlahpelaj arsainsdiIPTmakinkurang/Article/

OECD (2010), PISA 2009 at a Glance, OECD Publishing. (Available at:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46660259.pdf )

Oruç, Ş., ve Ulusoy, K. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler öğretimi alanında yapılan tez çalışmaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 121-132.

Petroski, H. (2010). The essential engineer: Why science alone will not solve our global problems. New York: Vintage Books: A division of random house.

Poll, H. (2004). American Perspectives on Engineers and Engineering: Reveals Public Perceptions of Engineering: 1998. from American Association of Engineering Societies. Retrieved from: http://www.aaes.org/ harris2004_files/frame.htm.

Reigeluth, C. M ve Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional- design theories and models (Volume III). London: Routledge.

Review of STEM Education

Rhoads, T. R., Walden, S. E., Winter, B. A (2004). Sooner Element Engineering and Science (SEES) a model for after school science clubs based on university and K-5 partnership.Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 47-52.

Saat, R. M. (2012). Practices in Mathematics & Science Education: A Reflection. In S. N. Akmar (Ed.), What We Learned From Science Education Reform: The Malaysian Experience. Selangor Darul Ehsan: Pearson Malaysia.

Singh, K., Granville. M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and Science Achievement: Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.

Swenson, G. (2015). President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

The Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing & Midwifery (2001). An introduction to systematicreviews. Changing Practice, 1, 1-6.

U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from :http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/ uploads/ ACC-report-final.pdf

Uğraş, M. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin Stem uygulamalarına yönelik görüşleri.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2010). Education for all.Global monitoring report.Retrived from: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/le ading-the-international-agenda/efareport/reports/

Yarker, M, B., Park, S. (2012). Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 223-232.

Yıldırım, B., ve Altun, Y. (2015). STEM eğitim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının fen bilgisi laboratuar dersindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28-40.