THREE BASIC CONCEPTS IN TEACHING THE ATOM: INFINITY, VOID AND ARCHE

Authors

  • Sertac ARABACIOGLU Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Education, Department of Science Education, 48000, Kotekli, Mugla-Turkey
  • Ayse OGUZ-UNVER Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Education, Department of Science Education, 48000, Mugla-Turkey
  • Guray UNVER Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Department of Archeology, 48000, Mugla-Turkey

Abstract

In this study the concepts of arche (essence), infinity and void that are rooted in the atomist thoughts of ancient Greek philosophers have been explained using easily applicable scientific activities. The activities were carried out with a study group of (N=73) participants consisting of science teacher candidates. Worksheets were used to carry out and evaluate the activities and the qualitative data obtained were evaluated. It was concluded as a result of the study that questioning the continuity of matter, comprehending matter as void and arche are important in understanding the concept of atom and nature and that macro world is not a copy of the micro world meaning that it should be perceived differently. In addition to the results, the study also suggests a different approach that makes it easier to teach the concept of atom via introductory activities developed with inspiration from the work of antique period philosopher Lucretius entitled De Rerum Natura.

Keywords: Atom, Infinity, Void, Arche, Scientific Activity.

REFERENCES

Albanese, A.,& Vicentini, M. (1997). Why Do We Believe that an Atom is Colourless? Reflections about the Teaching of the Particle Model. Science & Education, 6(3), 251-261. doi: 10.1023/a:1017933500475

Baine, T. (2007). Antimatter Teaching Module.  Retrieved 23.04.2013, from CERN Education http://education.web.cern.ch/education/Chapter2/Teaching/atm.html

Capelle, W. (2006). Sokrates'ten Önce Felsefe (O. Özügül, Trans.). İstanbul: Pencere Yayınları.

Eyüpoğlu, İ. Z. (2001). Lucretius’un Sorunları, IN: Lucretius Carus, Varlığın Yapısı I, Tr. İ.Z. Eyüpoğlu, Cumhuriyet Yayınları, Dünya Klasikleri Dizisi, no. 142, 2001, 18-25.

Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290609

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80 (5), 509-534. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199609)80:5<509::aid-sce2>3.0.co;2-f

Lucr.= Lucretius Carus, Titus: Lucretius, Of the nature of things: a metrical translation by William Ellery Leonard. (London [etc.] J. M. Dent & sons ltd.; New York, E.P. Dutton & co., (1921). Online edition: Perseus Digital Library.    http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0550.phi001.perseus-eng1:1.599

Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study. Science Education, 62(3), 273-281. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730620303

Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187-196. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730650209

Nussbaum, J. (2005). History and Philosophy of Science and the Preparation for Constructivist Teaching: The Case of Particle Theory. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View(pp. 165-194). London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Renström, L., Anderson, B., & Marton, F. (1990). Students’ conception of matter, Journal of Chemical Psychology, 82 (3), 555-559.

Yeğnidemir, D. (2000). Temel Eğitim 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinde Madde Ve Maddenin Tanecikli-Boşluklu Hareketli Yapısı İle İlgili Yanlış Kavramların Tespiti Ve Giderilmesi, Unpublished Master Thesis , Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara. 

Downloads

Published

2014-07-31

Issue

Section

Research Article