SOCIAL NETWORKS IN SUPPORTING EDUCATION
Abstract
Information technologies have exhibited great progress. Not just too far back, when we consider the last 25-30 year period, in terms of comparison of previous and modern communication tools, inconceivable progress can be observed. Type and variety of inter-personal communication have displayed continuous advancement in this new era introduced by technology. Whereas new emerging communication forms remove the distances among people, they bring up new dimensions to interpersonal information exchange at the same time. Such an extensive usage of internet impels educators toutilize from social networksmore than ever. By forming various socialgroups in these networks,information share and communication within groups intensifies. Social Network Websites (SNW) which facilitate cooperation among users andenable them to form communities are products of Web 2.0 technologies (Balcikanli, 2010). As result of enhanced communication between teacher and student throughestablished SNWs, education process can be maintained more effectively.
Keywords: Social Network, Education, The Education System.
References
Hargreaves, A, “Sustainability of educational change: The role of social geographies,” Journal of Educational Change., 3(3-4), pp. 189–214, 2002.
Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learning – Social software’s killer ap? In Conference of the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA) (pp. 1–12). Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia.
Arroyo, C. G. (2011). On-line social networks: innovative ways towards the boost of collaborative language learning. In International Conference ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition. Florence, Italy.
Aydın, C. Ç., Biroğul, S. (2008). E- LearningdeAçıkResourceKodluÖğretimYönetimSistemlerive Moodle. BilişimTechnologiesDergisi, 1(2), 31-36.
Balcikanli, C. (2010). The effects of social networking on pre-service english teachers’ metacognitive awareness and teaching practice. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V.,&Rasul, I. (2010). Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B. ve Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings : A case study of the e-learning benefits of ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151– 170.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., KılıçÇakmak, E., Akgün, E.A., Karadeniz Ş. veDemirel, F. (2012).BilimselAraştırmaYöntemleri (11. Baskı). Ankara: PegemYayınları
Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Yunkul, E., 2014.Eğitimdeeğitselsocialağsitelerininkullanımı: edmodoörneği. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences 41.SayıTemmuz 2014 / Number 41 309-316.
Ekici, M., Kıyıcı, M., 2012 Social networksneğitimbağlamındakullanımı.UşakÜniversitesiSocialBilimlerDergisi 5/2, 156-167
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N. veAbidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187.
Karpinski, A. C. ve Duberstein, A. (2009).A description of facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students.In American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. San Diego, California.
Kert, S. B. veKert, A. (2010).The usage potential of social network sites for educational purposes. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 486–507.
Kirschner, P. a. veKarpinski, A. C. (2010).Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245.
Mason, R. veRennie, F. (2008). E-learning and social networking handbook: resources for higher education.
McLoughlin, C. and Lee M. J. W., 2007. “Social software and participatory learning: pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the web 2.0 era,” Paper presented at the Ascilite, Singapore,
New York: Routledge. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R.E., ve Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on ‘Facebook’: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1-17. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a769651179
Odabasi, H. F., Misirli, O., Gunuc, S., Timar, Z. S., Ersoy, M., Som, S., …Erol, O. (2012). Egitimicinyenibirortam: Twitter. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2(1), 89–103.
Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A. ve Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30 (3), 227-238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
S.G. Mazman, “Social networksnbenimsenmesüreciveeğitselbağlamdakullanımı,” YayınlanmamışYüksekLisansTezi, HacettepeÜniversitesi, Fen bilimleriEnstitüsü, Ankara, 2009.
Tonta, Y. (2009). DijitalYerliler, SocialAglarveKutuphanelerinGelecegi. Turk Kutuphaneciligi, 23(4), 742–768.
Yu Y. A., Stella, T. W., Doug, V. & Kwok, C.W. (2012). Can Learning be Virtually Boosted? An Investigation of Online Social Networking Impacts.Computers & Education.Computers & Education, Vol. 55, No. 4.pp. 1494- 1503.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.