PHYSICS TEACHERS’ BELIEFS ABOUT THE ATTAINMENT OF SKILL OBJECTIVES AND THE EXTENT OF THESE BELIEFS’ REFLECTION ON TEACHERS’ INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES

Authors

  • Serkan KAPUCU Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Faculty of Education
  • Ufuk YILDIRIM Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Education

Abstract

Turkish Ministry of National Education has made important changes in both primary and secondary school curricula in the last decade. The Turkish High School Physics Curriculum (THSPC) after these changes was put into practice first in 2008-2009 education year. Apart from being the first written curriculum with written objectives, this curriculum also contained—differently from other previous physics curricula—skill objectives. This included objectives related to problem solving skills (PSS) and information and communication skills (ICS) and physics-technology-society-environment objectives (PTSEO). No matter how well-prepared a curriculum for a subject is, whether it is implemented effectively depends on the teachers. One of the factors affecting proper implementation of curricula is teachers’ beliefs about the curricula as a whole and its constituent elements. Since the curriculum is relatively new, teachers’ beliefs and how these beliefs are reflected in their instructional practices are not yet known. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate physics teachers’ beliefs about the attainment of PSS, PTSEO and ICS and the extent these beliefs were reflected in teachers’ instructional practices. Data were collected by administering an open-ended questionnaire to four in-service physics teachers and observing their instructional practices in the ‘nature of physics’ and ‘energy’ units. The results of this study showed that although physics teachers believed that majority of the skill objectives of the THSPC should be attained, they did not teach physics by taking these skill objectives into consideration. The physics teachers inclined more to help students attain PTSEO when compared with PSS and ICS.

Keywords: Teachers’ Beliefs, Turkish High School Physics Curriculum, Skill Objectives.

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. D. (1996). Study of curriculum reform [volume I: findings and conclusion.] studies of education reform. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED397535)

Akay, C. (2009). Genel ortaöğretim kurumlarında uygulanmakta olan fizik dersi programlarının, toplam kalite yönünden sahip olduğu özellikler. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(3), 1-17.

Balta, N., & Eryılmaz, A. (2011). Turkish new high school physics curriculum: teachers' views and needs. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, Special Issue, 72-88.

Baybars, M. G., & Kocakülah, M. S. (2009). Evaluation of grade 9 physics curriculum based on teacher’s views. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, 1121-1126.

Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 121-139.

Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practice: a case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2), 185-199.

Cheung, D., & Wong, H. (2002). Measuring teachers’ beliefs about alternative curriculum designs. The Curriculum Journal, 13(2), 225-248.

Ergin, İ., Şafak, M., & İngenç, Ş. K. (2011). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf fizik dersi öğretim programının öğelerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 6(4), 2537-2554.

Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: the role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-11.

Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum theory and practice (6th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Inc.

Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry based science with teachers: essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631-645.

Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1-22.

Mansour, N. (2009). Science-Technology-Society (STS). A new paradigm in science education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 287-297.

Marulcu, İ., & Doğan, M. (2010). Ortaöğretim fizik ders kitaplarına ve müfredatlarına Afyonkarahisar’daki öğretmen ve öğrencilerin bakışı. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29(2), 193-209.

Marques, J. F., & McCall, C. (2005). The application of interrater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 10(3), 439-462.

Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82(2), 197-214.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. California: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2007). Grade 9 Turkish High School Physics Curriculum. Retrieved May 1, 2010, from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/ program.aspx

National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ogborn, J. (2002). Ownership and transformation: teachers using curriculum innovations. Physics Education, 37(2), 142-146.

Özdemir, E., Benli, A., Dörtlemez, D., Yalçın, Y., Tanel, R. Kaya, S. et al. (2011). 2005 Ortaöğretim fizik programı düzenlemelerinin öğretmen adayları ve öğretmen görüşleriyle değerlendirilmesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 68-89.

Richmond, G., & Anderson, C. (2003). The nature of tensions between educator and teacher candidate beliefs about science teaching practice. Retrieved March 3, 2010, from https://www.msu.edu/~andya/TEScience/Assets/Conferences/NARST2003/GRNARSTPaperFINAL.doc

Simmons, P., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., et al. (1999). Beginning teachers: beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930–954.

Smith, L. K., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms?: elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 396-423.

Tondeur, J., Braak, J. V., & Valcke, M. (2007). Curricula and the use of ICT in education: two worlds apart? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 962-976.

Uzuntiryaki, E., Boz, Y., Kirbulut, D., & Bektas, O. (2010). Do pre-service chemistry teachers reflect their beliefs about constructivism in their teaching practices? Research in Science Education, 40(3), 403-424.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-31

Issue

Section

Research Article